McFadden Law Offices

Add to Favorites

Attorneys, Child Custody Attorneys, Divorce Attorneys

Be the first to review!

OPEN NOW

Today: 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

19 Years

in Business

(541) 899-4900Call Visit WebsiteVisit Website Map & DirectionsDirections3737 Highway 238Jacksonville, OR 97530 Write a ReviewWrite Review

Is this your business?

Customize this page.

Claim This Business

Hours

Regular Hours

Mon - Fri:	9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Places Near Jacksonville with Attorneys

Ruch (6 miles)
Medford (12 miles)
Central Point (13 miles)

More Info

Other Link: http://mcfaddenlawfirm.com
Categories: Attorneys, Child Custody Attorneys, Divorce Attorneys, Employment Discrimination Attorneys, Family Law Attorneys, Malpractice Law Attorneys, Medical Malpractice Attorneys, Personal Injury Law Attorneys

Gallery

Be the first to add a photo!

Reviews

Hi there!
Be the first to review!

Click to Rate

Details

Phone: (541) 899-4900

Address: 3737 Highway 238, Jacksonville, OR 97530

Website: http://mcfaddenlawfirm.com

More Like This

View similar Attorneys

Suggest an Edit

McFadden Law Offices

Divorce
Divorce mediation is a frequently used method of negotiating a divorce settlement and can be a cost effective option to settle all matters in your divorce out of court. Divorce mediation allows you to arrive at a resolution based on your own ideas of what is fair in your situation. As a mediator we wouldn’t make decisions for you, but help you and your spouse figure out what's best.
Child Support
Alimony and child support, both temporary and permanent, are often a disputed issue in divorce cases. We’ll negotiate and litigate for the best possible settlement for you regarding the amount, type and duration of alimony. We will also guide you through the process for determining child support and work with you to secure the best possible outcome for your personal situation.
Child Custody and Visitation
Making the right arrangements for your children is a vitally important part of organizing your affairs after a divorce. We will guide you through the process of determining legal and physical custody arrangements. We will also guide you through the process of outlining a parenting plan for the court to demonstrate how your custody arrangements will be tailored in the best interest of your children.
Spousal Support
Each case involving a termination of alimony based on cohabitation may involve the analysis of the parties divorce resolution terms as well as a review of the requirements of N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(n).

Wrongful Termination
In an employment discrimination case, the court generally determines if a plaintiff has met its initial burden. For example, in a wrongful termination case this would be that you are a member of the protected class, that you were performing your job, and you were subject to an adverse employment action. Generally the employer then sets forth the reason it asserts for the discharge and the plaintiff then has to provide evidence that the reason proffered by the employer was a “pretext” and that the true reason for the adverse employment decision was unlawful discrimination. If this issue is disputed by genuine factual evidence then the jury decides this issue.
Employment Discrimination
In New Jersey an employer cannot fail to hire or promote a person based on their race, national origin, nationality, age, gender, civil union status, religion, or physical disability. All employment discrimination claims are required to meet the burden of proving the elements of a prima facie case. The required elements to be successful can differ depending on the specific circumstance and the type of employment discrimination claimed.

Personal Injury
The issue of whether a cause of action for personal injury or a personal injury award is subject to equitable distribution is not settled in New Jersey. New Jersey Statute Annotated 2A:34-23 states in part that a Court may, "...effectuate an equitable distribution of the property, both real and personal, which was legally and beneficially acquired by them or either of them during the marriage."
Medical Malpractice
Amato v. Amato, 180 NJ. Super. 206 (App. Div. 1981), the trial court awarded the non-injured spouse twenty-five (25%) percent of the injured spouse's inchoate right to sue for medical malpractice. The Appellate Court vacated in part and remanded the case to the trial court. The Appellate Court held that a spouse's chose in action for pain and suffering is not property subject to equitable distribution.

View All Services

Provided by