Carico David D Attorney At Law

Add to Favorites

Civil Litigation & Trial Law Attorneys, Accident & Property Damage Attorneys, Attorneys

Be the first to review!

CLOSED NOW

Today: 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Tomorrow: 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

(415) 291-0440Visit WebsiteMap & Directions100 Montgomery StSan Francisco, CA 94129 Write a Review

Is this your business?

Customize this page.

Claim This Business

Hours

Regular Hours

Mon - Fri:	9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Carico David D Attorney At Law

Paternity
A brief filed by counsel pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, in a criminal defendant's first appeal in which appellate counsel informs the appellate court that there are no arguable issues on appeal and requests the appellate court to make an independent review of the record. Appointed counsel is not required to withdraw as long as he does not inform the reviewing court that the appeal is frivolous and appointed counsel informs the client of his right to have appellate counsel relieved. Counsel is required to file a brief with the reviewing court presenting a complete statement of the case and facts, and a request for the reviewing court to conduct its own independent review of the record. The appellant must be informed by appellate counsel that the intention is to file a Wende brief and that the appellant may submit his own supplemental brief to the court if he so desires. The appellate court is required to issue a written opinion disposing of the possible issues mentioned. Several cases have purported to extend Wende requirements to non-civil appeals in juvenile delinquincy appeals, termination of parental rights, and paternity cases.

View All Services

Provided by

Places Near San Francisco with Civil Litigation & Trial Law Attorneys

Sausalito (7 miles)
Belvedere Tiburon (8 miles)
Marin City (9 miles)
Daly City (10 miles)
Mill Valley (14 miles)
Brisbane (14 miles)

More Types of Legal Services in San Francisco

Mediation Services Legal Service Plans Immigration Law Attorneys Bail Bonds General Practice Attorneys Divorce Attorneys Automobile Accident Attorneys Adoption Law Attorneys Legal Clinics Estate Planning Attorneys Attorneys Immigration Bonds Construction Law Attorneys Small Business Attorneys Sexual Harassment Attorneys Tax Attorneys Malpractice Law Attorneys Process Servers Personal Injury Law Attorneys Probate Law Attorneys Wrongful Death Attorneys Criminal Law Attorneys Family Law Attorneys Business Law Attorneys Legal Document Assistance Medical Law Attorneys Business Litigation Attorneys Insurance Attorneys Paralegals Traffic Law Attorneys Bankruptcy Law Attorneys Medical Malpractice Attorneys Real Estate Attorneys Child Custody Attorneys Product Liability Law Attorneys Consumer Law Attorneys Elder Law Attorneys Federal Law Attorneys

More Info

Neighborhoods

Financial District, Northeast San Francisco

AKA

David D Carico Attorney at Law

Caricodaviddatty

Other Link

http://www.caricolaw.com

Categories

Civil Litigation & Trial Law Attorneys, Accident & Property Damage Attorneys, Attorneys, Automobile Accident Attorneys, Criminal Law Attorneys, DUI & DWI Attorneys, Family Law Attorneys, Traffic Law Attorneys

Gallery

Be the first to add a photo!

Reviews

Hi there!
Be the first to review!

Click to Rate

Details

Phone: (415) 291-0440

Address: 100 Montgomery St, San Francisco, CA 94129

Website: http://www.caricolaw.com

People Also Viewed

View similar Civil Litigation & Trial Law Attorneys

Suggest an Edit

Carico David D Attorney At Law

Paternity
A brief filed by counsel pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, in a criminal defendant's first appeal in which appellate counsel informs the appellate court that there are no arguable issues on appeal and requests the appellate court to make an independent review of the record. Appointed counsel is not required to withdraw as long as he does not inform the reviewing court that the appeal is frivolous and appointed counsel informs the client of his right to have appellate counsel relieved. Counsel is required to file a brief with the reviewing court presenting a complete statement of the case and facts, and a request for the reviewing court to conduct its own independent review of the record. The appellant must be informed by appellate counsel that the intention is to file a Wende brief and that the appellant may submit his own supplemental brief to the court if he so desires. The appellate court is required to issue a written opinion disposing of the possible issues mentioned. Several cases have purported to extend Wende requirements to non-civil appeals in juvenile delinquincy appeals, termination of parental rights, and paternity cases.
Child Abuse

Criminal Defense
David Carico has conducted numerous civil and criminal appeals. These are several recent examples of the appeals that he has handled.
DUI/DWI
An appellate practice is a specialty that is different from trial practice. Someone seeking to defend themselves against a DUI charge would consult a criminal defense attorney with experience in DUI cases, as opposed to using a general criminal attorney or an attorney who does not practice criminal law at all.
Traffic Violations
Sex Crimes
Sixth District Appellate Program & First District Appellate Program, Training Seminar: Legal Issues relating to homicide and complex sex offenses, (June, 2002)
Robbery
DESCRIPTION: The defendant and his brother were convicted of first degree murder with special circumstances arising out of a robbery and shooting of a store clerk at a 7-Eleven Store in Downey, California. Appellate lawyer David Carico ’ s client was the defendant and appellant. The client's girlfriend implicated him in the murder, claiming that he confessed the crime to her. There was also a videotape of the robbery that clearly showed the clothing worn by the assailants. A couple of high school counselors identified the client and his brother from the video, and one of them remembered the jacket. The getaway driver, a friend of the client and his brother, testified that he drove the client and his brother to the scene of the crime, but that he did not observe the robbery or have any knowledge of it or part in it.
Misdemeanors
THE RESULT: The judgment was reversed. The District Attorney offered a no contest plea to misdemeanor battery so that the conviction would not affect the civil suit, no sex offender registration, and to reduce or eliminate the jail time..
Assault
On appeal, attorney Carico argued that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to instruct on the lesser included offenses of simple assault and battery.
Murder
DESCRIPTION: California appellate attorney David Carico represented the appellant in this case who was convicted of second degree murder arising out of a feud between drug dealers. Several witnesses testified that they saw the defendant shoot the victim in the stomach with a shotgun. The defense presented by the trial attorney was self-defense, but he failed to develop the defense and presented inconsistent defenses:one of self-defense and one of actual innocence.
Homicide
Manslaughter
THE RESULT: On remand, the prosecution offered to reduce the charge to manslaughter and the defendant pled to this offense.

Auto Accidents

Trusts and Estates

Probate

View All Services

Provided by